亚洲色怡人综合网站,国产性夜夜春夜夜爽,久久97AV综合,国产色视频一区二区三区

English 中文網 漫畫網 愛新聞iNews 翻譯論壇
中國網站品牌欄目(頻道)
當前位置: Language Tips> 天天讀報> 每日播報

Demolition law criticized

[ 2010-02-02 11:23]     字號 [] [] []  
免費訂閱30天China Daily雙語新聞手機報:移動用戶編輯短信CD至106580009009

Draft permits the destruction of housing for non-public interests

Scholars have opened fire on a new draft amendment on the demolition of urban housing, saying a stipulation permits the destruction of homes for "non-public interests" is in violation of the country's Constitution.

The amendment, which was made public on Friday, is being criticized for its No 40 item, which says, "to demolish housing for constructions of non-public interest, the constructors, such as real estate developers, need to ask permission from related governments".

Ma Guangyuan, a researcher with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said this stipulation should be deleted as both the Constitution and the draft revision itself say "the government can only confiscate citizens' property for public interest".

The draft revision emphasizes public interest but could be ruined by this single item, Ma said. This stipulation still authorizes the government to permit demolitions for non-public interests.

The existing regulation on urban housing demolition, allowing local governments to confiscate homes and claim land, has sparked growing violence and even prompted some protesters to set themselves on fire.

"If the new guidelines do not make real changes concerning this part, the draft revision is just a technical instead of a real change to the original one," said Wang Xixin, a professor from Peking University, who also disagrees with this stipulation.

Wang said the State Council Legislative Affairs Office had informed him that they would issue another regulation about demolishing for non-public interest. However, no date for its publication has been given.

"I suggested the deletion of this guideline too but they didn't do it," Wang said.

The law ought to make clear: You cannot confiscate land if the purpose behind it is not "public interest," Wang said.

"If non-public interest demolitions are specifically outlawed, then the property owner and the developer would have to work out a selling price between themselves, in a civil agreement, and the government would not get involved.

“Government officials are not supposed to permit anything."

Questions:

1. Which number is the disputed topic in the new draft law?

2. What does item No 40 allow that has caused the debate?

3. What is the emphasis of the new demolition draf laws?

Answers:

1. 40.

2. Demolition of housing for non-public uses.

3. Public interest.

去聽寫專區一展身手

(中國日報網英語點津 Helen 編輯)

Demolition law criticized

Demolition law criticized

Todd Balazovic is a reporter for the Metro Section of China Daily. Born in Mineapolis Minnesota in the US, he graduated from Central Michigan University and has worked for China Daily for one year.

 
中國日報網英語點津版權說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報網英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創作品,除與中國日報網簽署英語點津內容授權協議的網站外,其他任何網站或單位未經允許不得非法盜鏈、轉載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883631聯系;凡本網注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉載,請與稿件來源方聯系,如產生任何問題與本網無關;本網所發布的歌曲、電影片段,版權歸原作者所有,僅供學習與研究,如果侵權,請提供版權證明,以便盡快刪除。
 

關注和訂閱

人氣排行

翻譯服務

中國日報網翻譯工作室

我們提供:媒體、文化、財經法律等專業領域的中英互譯服務
電話:010-84883468
郵件:translate@chinadaily.com.cn