亚洲色怡人综合网站,国产性夜夜春夜夜爽,久久97AV综合,国产色视频一区二区三区

您現在的位置: Language Tips> Audio & Video> Normal Speed News  
   
 





 
US lawmakers divided on Afghanistan
[ 2009-11-23 15:56 ]

 

US lawmakers divided on Afghanistan

As U.S. President Barack Obama nears an anticipated decision on America's future engagement in Afghanistan, opinions remain sharply divided in Congress, which would provide funding for the mission.

Weeks have passed since President Obama's top commander in Afghanistan formally urged the White House to order a swift surge of U.S. troops to battle militant extremists in the violence-plagued nation. President Obama has promised to unveil a detailed plan for Afghanistan in coming weeks, one that he says will address every aspect of U.S. strategy in the war and put the United States and its NATO allies on a path to victory.

But what the White House sees as a necessary, thoughtful process to arrive at the best-possible decision on an eight-year conflict is seen as dangerous "dithering" [delay] by Republican legislators. Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee spoke on Fox News Sunday.

"He [Obama] should show a sense of urgency and come up to Congress and tell us exactly what he plans to do," said Alexander.

Fellow-Republican Senator Kit Bond of Missouri blasted the president for recent comments in which he stressed the need for an exit strategy from Afghanistan.

"Now saying we are going in with a plan of getting out tells not only our troops that we are unsure about [U.S.] support [for the mission], but it tells the people of Afghanistan that the United States does not have the will to stay,” said Bond. “We have to win the confidence of the people of Afghanistan."

But not everyone believes that more U.S. troops, however rapidly deployed, will assure the defeat of Taliban militants and deny terrorists a safe haven from which to plan attacks on Western targets. Among the skeptics is Democratic Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, who also appeared on Fox News Sunday.

"I do not believe we ought to add troops in Afghanistan unless it is indispensable in our war against al-Qaida,” said Specter. “If it is, then we have to do whatever it takes because al-Qaida is out to annihilate us. If they can organize as well in Yemen or Somalia or someplace else, then why fight in Afghanistan where no one [outside force] has been successful for millennia?"

U.S. public-opinion surveys show declining support for the war in Afghanistan. Many analysts believe President Obama will order additional U.S. forces to Afghanistan, but the total will be less than the 40,000 troops requested by his top commander in the country, General Stanley McChrystal.

annihilate: to destroy completely(消滅;殲滅)

Related stories:

NATO chief confident Afghanistan will have more troops

British PM defends military mission in Afghanistan

Obama calls Karzai, urges 'new chapter' in Afghanistan

Britain to send more troops to Afghanistan

(Source: VOA 英語點津編輯)

英語點津版權說明:凡注明來源為“英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創作品,除與中國日報網簽署英語點津內容授權協議的網站外,其他任何網站或單位未經允許不得非法盜鏈、轉載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883631聯系;凡本網注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉載,請與稿件來源方聯系,如產生任何問題與本網無關;本網所發布的歌曲、電影片段,版權歸原作者所有,僅供學習與研究,如果侵權,請提供版權證明,以便盡快刪除。
相關文章 Related Story
 
 
 
本頻道最新推薦
 
《暮光之城2》周末狂攬2.5億美元
《哈利·波特與混血王子》精講之四
To cook up something 編造理由
非居民用電 non-residential electricity
MJ glove has Macao hotelier moonwalking
翻吧推薦
 
論壇熱貼
 
萬圣節問題火熱征集!
翻譯達人評選,快來投票!
經典英語口語,不得不看(推薦)
I chocolate you!怎么翻譯?
請教obama演講里的一句話